Category: google

Falling CPCs are inevitable if Google increases paid ad space

True to form, Google announced another bumper quarter last night. But one statistic causing some hand wringing is the continual fall of CPC prices.

Google say this isn’t a problem and not a concern for their business. Not only do I agree with them, but I think Google are the cause of the decrease in CPCs. Here’s a simple thought experiment to show why.

Let’s imagine a scenario where an advertiser gets 100 clicks a day from a search query. Let’s say 20 come from a paid ad and 80 come from an organic listing. Also, let’s assume that clicks from both convert at an equal rate (5%).

So our SEM report for day 1 looks like this:

Paid clicksCPCOrganic clicksConversion rateConversionsCostCPA
20$1.00805%5$20.00$4.00

So the advertiser is happy, hitting his/her CPA target.

However, Google, in the quest for higher revenues, decides to increase the paid ad space on the page. Overnight, sitelinks, product ads etc appear, pushing the organic listings further below the fold. As a result, more traffic goes through the paid ads. The SEM report for day 2, to the advertiser’s horror, looks like this:

Paid clicksCPCOrganic clicksConversion rateConversionsCostCPA
30$1.00705%5$30.00$6.00

At this point, the advertiser does what anyone would do to get back to their target. They reduce their bids.

Satisfyingly, this prompt action means day 3′s report reveals this:

Paid clicksCPCOrganic clicksConversion rateConversionsCostCPA
30$0.67705%5$20.10$4.02

As Google increases the supply of paid ads and the demand stays the same, then the price will fall. That’s simple economics.

Google isn’t resting on its laurels. Many macro factors (e.g. spread of the internet in developing markets) and controllable factors (e.g. better targeting, more network partners) mean they can increase the revenue from paid ads despite the fall in CPCs.

The real stat, which Google doesn’t reveal, is the growth of monetisable impressions. That is, search queries that have ads against them. If that increases, all is good.

Update

Google have been releasing paid clicks and CPC variance data since Q2 2009. I’ve taken that to produce an indexed view of change over time.

As you can see since Q2 2008, although CPCs have declined about 19%, the number of paid clicks has increased by 130%. That’s not a bad trade-off.

Google Think Quarterly print edition

My copy of Google Think Quarterly just arrived in the post. Although it’s available online, Google has sent me a lovely hardback copy. Probably one of the nicest pieces of print marketing I’ve seen in a long while; I dread to think what the unit cost is. Here are some photos:

Came in a nice cardboard box with a card that was in a handwritten envelope. Note the wax seal on the ribbon.

The book was inside a red translucent protector, showing a human brain on the cover

Remove the cover, and in fact there’s a lightbulb inside the brain too

A closer look at the lightbulb reveals it’s made up of my name. Add 25% to the unit cost.

At the back there’s a three-dimensional, pop-up infographic about TFL’s cycle hire scheme. Add another 25% to the unit cost.

On the back, handwritten, is 885/1500, so I feel honoured I made it into such a short print run!

Another great year for Google UK

Google released its Q4 ’10 earnings last week. I’ve taken the figures for the UK and converted them to pounds which gives some insight on Google’s performance here in Blighty.

2010 showed a 13% growth on 2009, as Google recorded c.£2.15bn of revenue in the UK. It’s a staggering amount – ITV will probably make £1.4bn in revenues from TV advertising in 2010 (based on their H1 results).

Here are the charts that give the quarter-on-quarter view since 2007.

Quarterly revenue in GBP and USD

Year-on-year change

Quarter-on-quarter change

Google’s Q1 UK revenues in GBP

So Google’s Q1 results came out over a month ago, so this post is quite late. Nevertheless, here the usual UK analysis. I’ve tweaked the chart to give the USD change too.

QuarterUSD (millions)GBP (millions)FX
Q1 075782960.5117
Q2 076003020.5037
Q3 076613270.4948
Q4 076923380.4891
Q1 088034060.5056
Q2 087743930.5071
Q3 087764100.5282
Q4 086854370.6373
Q1 097335100.6959
Q2 097154630.6474
Q3 097654660.6093
Q4 097724730.6127
Q1 108425400.6411

FX rates are taken from oanda.com.

Here’s the chart of the data table:

Here’s the year-on-year percentage growth:

And finally the quarter-on-quarter percentage growth:

There we have it. Google UK’s biggest quarter, no matter which currency you look at, not something that could have been said last year.

Google UK’s Q4 revenues in GBP

Google results came out yesterday, so here’s my usual look at the sterling version of the numbers.

QuarterUSD (millions)GBP (millions)FX
Q1 075782960.5117
Q2 076003020.5037
Q3 076613270.4948
Q4 076923380.4891
Q1 088034060.5056
Q2 087743930.5071
Q3 087764100.5282
Q4 086854370.6373
Q1 097335100.6959
Q2 097154630.6474
Q3 097654660.6093
Q4 097724730.6127

FX rates are taken from oanda.com as usual.

Here’s the chart of the data table:

Here’s the year-on-year percentage growth:

And finally the quarter-on-quarter percentage growth:

Perhaps the only concern is that QoQ, Q4 is only 1% up on Q3. You would hope it would be higher given all the additional retail activity during that time. But it’s a decent quarter all-in-all, up 8% YoY in GBP and 13% YoY in USD. Let’s hope there’s more of that to come in 2010.

Google UK’s Q3 revenues in GBP

This is an update on a previous post, looking at Google’s UK revenues in GBP. Google breaks out its UK revenues due to SEC regulations, but in dollars. This makes it difficult to determine how successful they’ve been in the UK because of currency fluctuations. I make the conversions back to sterling, so here’s the latest based on yesterday’s Q3 results.

QuarterUSD (millions)GBP (millions)FX
Q1 075782960.5117
Q2 076003020.5037
Q3 076613270.4948
Q4 076923380.4891
Q1 088034060.5056
Q2 087743930.5071
Q3 087764100.5282
Q4 086854370.6373
Q1 097335100.6959
Q2 097154630.6474
Q3 097654660.6093

FX rates are taken from oanda.com as usual.

Here’s the data in chart form:google-uk-revenue-gbp-q309

The quarter-over-quarter change:google-qoq-change-in-gbp-q309

And the year-over-year change:google-yoy-change-in-gbp-q309

Not a bad result at 14% up year-on-year. Looks positive for the economy, and pretty much what I expected after reading Efficient Frontier’s UK Q3 report.

Google’s UK Revenues in GBP

Google’s Q2 2009 results came out last week, with the usual parade of pre-forecasting and post-analysis. I thought it would be useful to breakout the UK component of their revenues. Being a US company, Google report in US dollars, so I’ve made a rough estimate of what those revenues are in sterling.

QuarterUSD (millions)GBP (millions)FX
Q1 075782960.5117
Q2 076003020.5037
Q3 076613270.4948
Q4 076923380.4891
Q1 088034060.5056
Q2 087743930.5071
Q3 087764100.5282
Q4 086854370.6373
Q1 097335100.6959
Q2 097154630.6474

I’ve taken the FX rates from quarterly mid-market averages supplied by oanda.com. And for the more visually minded, here’s that data in a chart:
google-uk-revenue-gbp

The data suggests that the UK business has started to mature since the start of 2008. We can clearly see the seasonal trends (high Q1, Q4; lower Q2, Q3) that one would expect as overall growth diminishes. Although we have only 2 quarters of data for this year so far, this seasonality seems to be more marked.

I’m sure, like me, you can’t resist a couple more charts. So here they are. The first one looks at quarter-over-quarter change:
google-qoq-change-in-gbp

The second looks at year-on-year change:
google-yoy-change-in-gbp

So with double-digit YoY growth in a recession, perhaps Google doesn’t have too much to worry about in the UK.

Google UK Revenues Down In USD, But Up In GBP

Google released their Q4 2008 results last night and on the face of it it didn’t look good for the UK business. Q4 revenues were down to $685m from $772m in Q3, and even down slightly from Q4 2007′s number of $692m. Of course what’s really done for Google UK is not the economy (so far), but the collapse of sterling.

A back of the envelope calculation in sterling terms actually shows an impressive increase in both quarter on quarter and year on year growth:

  • Q4 2007 – £338m
  • Q3 2008 – £408m
  • Q4 2008 – £437m

So the most recent quarter was up 29% Y/Y and 7% Q/Q in GBP terms, which isn’t so bad. Of course, this is little comfort to Google, an American company that reports in dollars. So Google hedged against currency movements in Q4 and managed to record a $129m income because of it. Clever sods.

To make the calculations, I took average quarterly mid-market interbank rates from Oanda.com. Someone who knows more about forex and finance than me could probably come up with a better analysis, but I think the above is a good rule of thumb.