<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SearchBeest &#187; microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchbeest.com/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchbeest.com</link>
	<description>Opinions on UK and European Search Engine Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Right with Microsoft Live Search</title>
		<link>http://searchbeest.com/2008/11/14/whats-right-with-microsoft-live-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=whats-right-with-microsoft-live-search</link>
		<comments>http://searchbeest.com/2008/11/14/whats-right-with-microsoft-live-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>searchbeest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchbeest.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month I ranted about some serious problems with search results for popular navigational queries on Microsoft Live Search. Dan Sharp commented that he&#8217;d written about the same issues at the start of the year. Within two weeks, Microsoft&#8217;s SEM-evangelist-at-large, Mel Carson, asked me to check again. And lo, the problems were fixed. It&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2008%2F11%2F14%2Fwhats-right-with-microsoft-live-search%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2008%2F11%2F14%2Fwhats-right-with-microsoft-live-search%2F&amp;source=searchbeest&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>Last month <a href="http://searchbeest.com/2008/10/27/whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search/">I ranted</a> about some serious problems with search results for popular navigational queries on Microsoft Live Search.<span id="more-108"></span></p>
<p>Dan Sharp <a href="http://searchbeest.com/2008/10/27/whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search/#comment-405">commented</a> that he&#8217;d <a href="http://www.ppcblog.co.uk/microsoft-live/hey-msn-live-search-you-suck/">written about</a> the same issues at the start of the year.</p>
<p>Within two weeks, Microsoft&#8217;s SEM-evangelist-at-large, <a href="http://www.melcarson.com/">Mel Carson</a>, asked me to check again.  And lo, the problems <a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=facebook">were</a> <a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=myspace">fixed</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that Microsoft let these problems go on for so long, but full marks to them responding to my criticisms so quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchbeest.com/2008/11/14/whats-right-with-microsoft-live-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s Wrong with Microsoft Live Search</title>
		<link>http://searchbeest.com/2008/10/27/whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search</link>
		<comments>http://searchbeest.com/2008/10/27/whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>searchbeest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big snap 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft live search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchbeest.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got sent a link for Big Snap 2, Microsoft&#39;s latest promotion to get people to use Live Search. But let me tell you, they could give a Ferrari to every user and it still wouldn&#39;t get people to switch from Google. Why? Because the most basic relevance for some incredibly popular terms is still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2008%2F10%2F27%2Fwhats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2008%2F10%2F27%2Fwhats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search%2F&amp;source=searchbeest&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I got sent a link for <a href="http://www.bigsnapsearch.co.uk/" title="Big Snap Search">Big Snap 2</a>, Microsoft&#39;s latest promotion to get people to use Live Search. But let me tell you, they could give a Ferrari to every user and it still wouldn&#39;t get people to switch from Google.</p>
<p><span id="more-100"></span>Why? Because the most basic relevance for some incredibly popular terms is still awful. Let me give two examples:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong><a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=facebook" title="Live Search">Facebook</a></strong>: The first result for this search is&#8230; wait for it&#8230; Amicus: the trade union! How can that possibly be right? The Facebook homepage is down as position 6. Total crap.</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=myspace" title="Live Search">Myspace</a></strong>: The top result for this is web-date.co.uk, a site that&#39;s got more spam in it than a Monty Python convention. The Myspace homepage languishes at postion 5. Garbage.</li>
</ol>
<p>According to <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2008/08/9_in_10_uk_searches_are_naviga.html" title="Hitwise">Hitwise</a>, Facebook is the #1 search term in the UK; Myspace is #7. How many users are disappointed everyday on Live Search because of this?</p>
<p>Oh mighty gods of Microsoft, please, please, please get this right. Screw your algorithm, hand write these results.</p>
<p>I so want you to do well, as do many others in the SEM community. It&#39;s so incredibly important. Then I&#39;ll try to win a few John Lewis vouchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchbeest.com/2008/10/27/whats-wrong-with-microsoft-live-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad Exchanges Are the Future</title>
		<link>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/30/ad-exchanges-are-the-future/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ad-exchanges-are-the-future</link>
		<comments>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/30/ad-exchanges-are-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 09:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>searchbeest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ad exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/30/ad-exchanges-are-the-future/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a great article on Clickz by Eric Picard called &#8216;Ad Exchanges Are the Future&#8216;. Eric works for Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions. He has written a very clear description of what&#8217;s wrong with the current trading practices in media buying (outside of search) and how that&#8217;s going to change in the next 5 to 10 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F07%2F30%2Fad-exchanges-are-the-future%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F07%2F30%2Fad-exchanges-are-the-future%2F&amp;source=searchbeest&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There&#8217;s a great article on Clickz by Eric Picard called &#8216;<a href="http://clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3626556" title="Clickz">Ad Exchanges Are the Future</a>&#8216;.  Eric works for Microsoft Digital Advertising Solutions.  He has written a very clear description of what&#8217;s wrong with the current trading practices in media buying (outside of search) and how that&#8217;s going to change in the next 5 to 10 years.</p>
<p>The opening paragraph of his article states:</p>
<blockquote><p>Advertising is one of the last significant business markets that remains opaque, manual, archaically complex, and requires a large relatively skilled set of humans to perform each transaction. It&#8217;s a market ripe to embrace technology for automation, liquidity of inventory, pricing transparency, and simplification of business process.</p></blockquote>
<p>Extremely well put.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/30/ad-exchanges-are-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft adChamps</title>
		<link>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/01/microsoft-adchamps/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=microsoft-adchamps</link>
		<comments>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/01/microsoft-adchamps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>searchbeest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/01/microsoft-adchamps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday I was the guest of Microsoft at their adChamps event. Around 40 advertisers and agencies, large and small were invited to a full day with their engineers, researchers and executives. Microsoft have a lot of challenges in Europe and all credit to them for sharing their plans and visions for the adCenter platform. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F07%2F01%2Fmicrosoft-adchamps%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F07%2F01%2Fmicrosoft-adchamps%2F&amp;source=searchbeest&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>On Thursday I was the guest of Microsoft at their adChamps event.  Around 40 advertisers and agencies, large and small were invited to a full day with their engineers, researchers and executives.  Microsoft have a lot of challenges in Europe and all credit to them for sharing their plans and visions for the adCenter platform.  They invited feedback; they received it in spades.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into detail about the day (and in fact an NDA prevents me from doing so) but it&#8217;s enough to say that Microsoft has some big plans for the online advertising market and the next few years will be extremely interesting.  It was fascinating to meet people like <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/de/Najm/default.mspx" title="Tarek Najm bio">Tarek Najm</a> and it was extremely well organised and hosted by Mel Carson, AKA <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/profilev4.cgi?action=view&amp;member=adCenterEU" title="WebmasterWorld">AdCenterEU</a>.</p>
<p>The day was rounded off by dinner at the <a href="http://www.mintleafrestaurant.com/" title="Mint Leaf">Mint Leaf</a> restaurant on Haymarket.  I stumbled out at about 12.30am; around an hour later some people tried to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6255960.stm" title="BBC News">blow up</a> the whole street.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong></p>
<p>Microsoft generously gave everyone who attended a goodie bag which contained either Vista or Office 2007.  I chose the latter and installed it yesterday.  It&#8217;s a significant improvement on Office 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchbeest.com/2007/07/01/microsoft-adchamps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

