<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SearchBeest &#187; opacity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchbeest.com/category/opacity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchbeest.com</link>
	<description>Opinions on UK and European Search Engine Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Analysing the analysis of the search market</title>
		<link>http://searchbeest.com/2007/04/24/analysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=analysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market</link>
		<comments>http://searchbeest.com/2007/04/24/analysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>searchbeest</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[opacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem agencies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchbeest.com/2007/04/24/analysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always thought that there isn&#8217;t enough market analysis in search, so I was very interested to read the latest white paper from Latitude. &#8220;Is the UK paid search market more sophisticated than the US?&#8221; is the question that they have asked, and they&#8217;ve answered with a resounding yes. Before I hoist the Union Jack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F04%2F24%2Fanalysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsearchbeest.com%2F2007%2F04%2F24%2Fanalysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market%2F&amp;source=searchbeest&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve always thought that there isn&#8217;t enough market analysis in search, so I was very interested to read the latest <a href="http://www.searchlatitude.com/index.php?/weblog/permalink/how_us_search_marketing_industry_missed_out_on_nearly_11_billion_in_2006/" title="Latitude">white paper</a> from Latitude. &#8220;Is the UK paid search market more sophisticated than the US?&#8221; is the question that they have asked, and they&#8217;ve answered with a resounding yes. Before I hoist the Union Jack in the office and put a picture of The Queen behind my desk, I just want to make a couple of comments on the problems that all such studies face.</p>
<p>Latitude have made a simple assumption.  If US advertisers spent as big a proportion of their marketing budgets on search as we do in the UK (6.6%), then they would have spent another $10.9bn last year.  Wow &#8211; that&#8217;s enough to buy <a href="http://www.iac.com/" title="IAC">IAC</a> or <a href="http://www.ghana.gov.gh/" title="The Republic of Ghana">Ghana</a>, whichever you prefer.  So why the difference?</p>
<p>They have made a number of arguments to support their conclusion, not least by looking at a basket of &#8216;highly competitive&#8217; keywords on Yahoo&#8217;s  transparent pre-Panama auction.  There&#8217;s some interesting stuff (I particularly like the Maturity Index), but what would have been interesting is a look at Google&#8217;s data. But of course we can&#8217;t, because Google is a closed, opaque market, so we don&#8217;t know what the keywords cost at different positions.</p>
<p>This is the problem that all such studies face. Latitude hint at some discontent towards this, suggesting that an &#8216;invisible bid landscape&#8217; (such as Google or MSN&#8217;s) could harbour anti-competitive behaviour by the search engines, and might even require external regulation.  I&#8217;m <a href="http://searchbeest.wordpress.com/2007/04/09/search-marketing-code-of-conduct/" title="SearchBeest">no fan of regulation</a>, particularly when the challenge of closed markets is soluble for those with the right mathematical approach and technology.</p>
<p>I expect Panama to be functioning the UK by June, and at that point we&#8217;ll have a search market that is 100% opaque (apologies to MIVA, Mirago et al).  Unless search marketers can model keyword behaviour and prices within these markets, they are a significant disadvantage, whether they&#8217;re a media agency, SEM or in-house team.  So the more interesting question is, who, on either side of the pond, is equipped to meet this challenge?  I know at Efficient Frontier we are. If you&#8217;re using technology that was designed for the open market of Yahoo (née Overture, née GoTo), you&#8217;re probably not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://searchbeest.com/2007/04/24/analysing-the-analysis-of-the-search-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

